As a result, King Charles made the bold decision to evict Meghan Markle and Prince Harry from Frogmore Cottage in the summer of 2023. Yes, you read that correctly. Their father, the king, bade them farewell and told them to leave the palace.
You may be wondering why this is so. Now, Meghan, who has always sought the spotlight, appears to have taken offense to a simple photo that featured other members of the royal family instead of her husband, Prince Harry. Such a small issue caused great confusion and continued problems for the royal family.
What's really shocking is who moved into Frogmore Cottage after Meghan and Harry left. None other than Princess Eugenie and her sisters, including Princess Beatrice. It's shocking. These supposedly unemployed non-senior members of the royal family, often referred to as the "Others", are currently living in the very holiday home once owned by Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.
What's even more shocking is that they didn't pay a penny for it. Eugenie, who lives in Portugal with her husband and her children, conveniently used her cottage at Frogmore whenever she visited the UK. Beatrice also enjoyed the perks of being a royal without considering the cost. Can you believe that audacity?
British taxpayers paid for these royal privileges, but Eugenie and Beatrice appear to have had no idea about paying rent. Now, you may be wondering why King Charles allowed this. It's a question that confuses the mind. The answer lies in the deep cunning of Duchess Meghan, Prince Harry, and their alleged spy Eugenie. Eugenie, who maintains a close relationship with Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry, has used Frogmore Cottage as a convenient place to gather information about Meghan, presumably to support her future activities such as writing her memoirs. Looks like it was used. This is a truly worrying plan.
Because the truth will always come out. The king noticed the manipulation and took a stand. He refused to leave Frogmore vacant and insisted on finding a tenant who would pay for the privilege. Eventually the monarchy was reduced and every penny mattered.
The royal couple, who have made environmental activism one of the cornerstones of their public personas, have faced criticism over their travel choices. The use of private jets is often associated with excessive carbon emissions and is seen as inconsistent with their pledges to fight climate change.
Dubbed "astounding hypocrisy" by some critics, the backlash against Prince Harry and Meghan Markle was swift and fierce. Many argue that her decision to fly privately undermines her credibility as an environmental advocate. Although the couple supports causes such as conservation and promoting sustainable living, their travel choices seem strange and contradictory. As the Daily Express reports, the issue of private air travel and its impact on the environment has received a lot of attention in recent years. Private jets have been found to emit more carbon dioxide and contribute to global carbon emissions compared to commercial aircraft. Given the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions, the use of private jets has become a symbol of excess and privilege, often drawing the ire of environmentalists and climate change activists.
Critics claim the Duke and Duchess of Sussex missed an opportunity to lead by example. As high-profile figures, their actions are closely monitored and imitated. Choosing a private jet instead of looking for more sustainable options appears to be actively disrespecting the causes they claim to support. The move not only disappointed her supporters but also raised questions about the seriousness of her commitment to combating climate change.
Additionally, the couple's choice of travel destinations also drew criticism. Canouan, known for her luxurious resorts and elite clientele, may be at odds with her efforts to portray herself as a personable and down-to-earth person. The contrast between her extravagant outing and her public image as a champion of equality and social justice angered many.
Post a Comment