Ads
The narrative surrounding Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, and their children has been a source of endless speculation and controversy. From conspiracy theories about surrogacy to accusations of manipulation, the public discourse has been relentless. Meghan Markle's strategic mind, as some claim, saw the only foolproof way to keep Harry tethered to her was through their children. This analysis paints a Shakespearean picture of Meghan maneuvering her way through the royal landscape, using her offspring as pawns in her grand game.
Harry, once beloved, is now portrayed as ensnared in Meghan's web, with the world watching as she pulls the strings to ensure he remains firmly in her grasp. This isn't about family, critics argue; it's about control. Meghan's perceived manipulative tactics have never been more transparent, with claims that adopted or surrogate offspring have no claim to the throne, thus cannot be heirs.
Harry's struggle with his identity and his perceived inferiority to his brother, the future king, is seen as a driving force behind his actions. Some believe he is willing to let himself be exploited to create the illusion of a family life. His envy of his brother blinds him to the immense damage Meghan has allegedly caused to the monarchy. There is a hope that he will eventually see the destruction surrounding him.
Ads
Meghan's lack of foresight and retrospect due to immaturity is cited as a significant flaw. Her resentment and envy for Princess Catherine, mainly due to her status as future queen, are seen as driving factors. If Meghan had been more knowledgeable and wise, she would have seen that she had already positioned herself to alter the world when she married Harry. Critics suggest that the upheaval in the monarchy is intended to confuse and divide Harry to maintain control.
The controversy surrounding Archie’s birth and Meghan's pregnancies adds fuel to the fire. Some argue that if they stayed in the UK, Archie's DNA would be collected sooner rather than later. The allegations of falsified pregnancies and surrogacy, claiming the children are Harry's offspring but not Meghan's, are part of the narrative. However, the monarchy has seen every trick under the sun, and Meghan should take note that Princess Diana didn't survive to share many stories. The current monarchy is expected to outlast her children and tricks.
Meghan's alleged intention behind her marriage to Harry was to secure the royal wedding ring and the wealth that came with it. When she found that her life as Princess Henry was anything but pleasing herself, she began to present the royal family as cold, uncaring racists to justify leaving. Currently, she is using Harry as her flying monkey, loading him with lies that make him angry on her behalf and then setting him loose.
There are many clips of Meghan with a "moon bump" askew, leading to further speculation about her pregnancies. Her father's statement that she had a hysterectomy before meeting Harry, suggesting surrogacy for the first child, if not adoption, adds to the narrative. Ancient legal statutes require royal children to be seen to be born of the queen's body, although Meghan will never be queen. She made sure that no royal gynecologist came near her to verify the birth, leading to further suspicion.
Ads
Harry's book, "Spare," written in his name, contains words that some believe he would never have put together or understood. The narrative suggests that divorce is imminent, and Meghan is waiting for Harry to come into some money when he turns 40, maybe this year. There are concerns about the trust inheritance and how it will be managed if there is a sniff of a divorce. Harry's trust inheritance money is not within the power of a California court to make any rulings about unless he brings it to the US. If it comes from the trust and he keeps it in the UK, it will remain beyond Meghan's reach.
The possibility of Meghan leveraging the children for more money from King Charles is also discussed. King Charles is not tied monetarily to Meghan and owes her no money. However, all the money Meghan has squirreled away was marital funds and is subject to marital assets. What sticks in the mind is footage of Meghan, supposedly six-seven months pregnant, bobbing down to stroke a small dog. Her stance and the speed at which she dipped and rose again were at total variance with her supposed stage of pregnancy.
The narrative also explores the possibility of Meghan waiting for Harry's inheritance when he turns 40. Harry's trust inheritance money is not within the power of a California court to make any rulings about unless he brings it to the US. If it comes from the trust and he keeps it in the UK, it will remain beyond Meghan's reach. The possibility of Meghan trying to extort money by subtly threatening to sully Harry and the rest of the family is also mentioned.
The documentary by Andrew McCarthy titled "His Bratz" questions the story surrounding Meghan Markle's pregnancy with her first child, Archie. This documentary has sparked controversy, with claims of inconsistencies in Meghan's public appearances while pregnant. McCarthy thinks these inconsistencies could point to the use of a surrogate rather than Meghan actually carrying the child. The documentary includes interviews with unidentified medical specialists who offer professional opinions in support of the claim that Meghan was not pregnant with Archie.
Ads
The release of McCarthy's documentary has sparked considerable reaction on social media platforms like Twitter and Reddit, where disputes over the findings are heated. Many people have long been skeptical of Meghan's pregnancy, with some saying that finally, the truth is coming out. Meghan Markle and Harry have yet to reply publicly to the allegations made in McCarthy's documentary. However, sources close to the couple say they are considering legal action against McCarthy, claiming defamation and invasion of privacy.
This latest controversy adds to the slew of obstacles and scandals that have engulfed Meghan and Harry since they announced their decision to step down from royal duties in early 2020. Their connection with the British royal family has remained difficult, aggravated by their dramatic appearance with Oprah Winfrey during which they made devastating charges about the institution. If proven, the assertions in "His Bratz" could have far-reaching consequences, not only for the couple but also for the monarchy.
The secrecy surrounding who was publicly financed by the British government to deliver Archie is another point of contention. Meghan turned down the two top obstetric gynecologists who give their services to the royal family for free, leading to more questions. The British taxpayers should demand to examine the medical charges, including the champagne head wedding, which was also invoiced to the government and cost thousands of dollars.
Some contend that Meghan's weight gain following her pregnancy is normal for baby fat. However, questions about her facial or ankle puffiness prior to her maternity leave remain. The necessity of a moon bump after giving birth is also questioned. When a baby is delivered, hardworking women typically lose the bulge unless they overeat. Meghan, a supposed yoga guru, still looking six months pregnant, raises eyebrows.
Ads
The hospital where Archie was born is another point of contention. The government-covered costs for the hospital stay, use of the labor room, laughing gas that Harry drank down, the multiple epidurals that Meghan required, and more are all questioned. Meghan was never present at the Lindo Wing of Portland Hospital, where royalty typically delivers, and there is no evidence of her presence in the admission or discharge records.
Why did Kensington Palace announce before the official announcement that Archie was delivered via surrogacy? The truth, when it comes out, will reveal the lengths to which the involved parties went to hide the facts. Harry and Meghan's narrative, filled with secrecy and controversy, continues to be a subject of public fascination and debate.
Post a Comment