Ads
Diva Megan lays down the law with TV, and Harry is terrified too. Terrible! Our diva is increasing her price. It's not easy to invite her to events or shows. This doesn't sound very favorable, right? But it's okay; increasing her price is her business, and inviting her or not is the business of the big guys. The big guys don't have time to pay attention to small trash at the bottom of society, right? I mean, Megan is just a cockroach that appears everywhere, and anyone who doesn't pay attention will trample her to death immediately. But I still wonder why Megan thinks she is a diva. On what basis? Does she think that just because she participated in those interviews that defame the royal family on TV, she deserves the title of a celebrity?
Harry and Meghan will reveal everything. The more she tries to cover it up, the more I want to expose the truth. I want to expose Megan's intentions in those evil interviews. You know, when you have these big tell-all interviews and they sit down one-on-one, it may seem a little like the Oprah Winfrey thing where Harry and Megan were supposed to reveal everything. And if you remember the fakery of Megan's big reveal about the fact that she was expecting her daughter, remember that all of this would have been discussed, arranged, and more crucially, agreed upon and paid for. You don't give a huge surprise like that away for nothing, but the spontaneity was, "Oh, you know, I'm just sharing this with you." You see how it works? This is how the publicity machine currently works, and Harry must get used to it.
Ads
But what was amazing in his recent documentary over here, of course, about taking on the tabloids and all that sort of thing, "Tabloids on Trial," was how genuine everything was. In addition, I really want to know if you guys think the same as me. If anyone thinks that Megan and Harry's media appearances are pre-arranged and not trustworthy, please comment number one. And anyone who believes what Megan and Harry say can comment number two. I really want to know how many of you are my soulmates.
I know a lot of you appreciated the Dana Gillespie video. It is still available for others to enjoy. She's a fascinating girl who has literally met and worked with everyone. She's one of those people who has, you know, a book out and a new album, but she’s also got an interesting tale about what it was like for women in the early, middle, and late 1960s trying to make it big in the music industry. In many ways, it's similar to now, but as she pointed out, things were fundamentally different, and I believe her generation had far more influence than, say, today's ladies. I'd love to hear your thoughts on it. As I mentioned, she is a fascinating lady. Dana Gillespie is always free and available only on this channel, correct?
Back to your Royal tale for the day. This was intended to break a bunch of pots last week. You know, "Tabloids on Trial" included Hugh Grant, who was talking about his time working on hacking crimes and such. The long-forgotten singer Charlotte Church decided she didn't want fame and tried a few other things that didn't work out for her. And, of course, the former International player Paul Gascoigne. But the documentary's undisputed star, in ITN's opinion, was none other than the well-known Prince Harry. They did contact the Prince of Wales, His Royal Highness Prince William, but he politely declined to discuss it further. However, according to a source, Prince Harry was told that the issue was still being discussed with his elder brother. Is that why Harry decided to say yes? More crucially, it became the main point of the documentary.
Ads
Let me clarify. Becca Barry, the journalist who was interviewing him, said there's a little piece that you just know when working in television that allows everything to slip away. Harry mistakenly stated at the start, "Oh, nice to meet you in person," letting us know that there had been extended chats via Zoom, specifying exactly the questions in advance, the direction of the story, the level of filming, and, you know, the long shots of Harry chatting directly to the camera. He had the ultimate say over what he was going to wear, the set, the lighting, and the final edit, ensuring that he looked great. You'll observe that the question regarding missing evidence in the next trials is rapidly answered or at least quickly posed but never answered and drifts away without explanation.
One thing that didn't go as planned was that, of course, Megan had the final word over Miss Barry. Oh sure, according to a well-placed insider, Megan has complete control over the Harry and Megan Roadshow, the media empire, and she wanted to know exactly what questions Miss Barry would ask, her style, and so on. So she was provided show reels to review. You understand that she is a media specialist. Second, ITN continues to refuse to admit or reveal whether Prince Harry received a fee or whether he donated money to the Heart of Invictus, which I'm sure was a noble cause. You see how it works behind the scenes? ITN made a lot of money selling these clips all around the world. Not as much as prior stuff, but still quite worthwhile. Unfortunately for them, ITN, this was not a rating success with viewers that night. It wasn't one of the biggest hits, but it doesn't matter. Now it's all about the clips, and if you watch them digitally, you'll see how much money they're going to make selling them to other news organizations.
Ads
So if Harry expected "Tabloids on Trial" to resurrect and reframe the narrative of his understandably difficult relationship with the media, it simply did not work. But as always, ITN has been extremely quiet, expecting more future interviews with the former King. Harry is now a show pony used to sell tacky docu with washed-up forgotten celebrities. Besides, ITV must have money to waste. Why interview Harry? He has nothing new to say. Why waste money on old lies, fiction which is all in Harry's mind, but they never happened. Personally, I never want to hear Harry's voice or see his face ever again. I am sick of hearing that Prince Harry had opened up in a tell-all interview. He never stops opening up and telling all. Life passes very quickly, and Harry should be enjoying precious times with his children, not dwelling on past wrongs or perceived wrongs. If he is truly happy, then what has gone before should now be just a fading memory. Surely one day his father will be gone, and he has wasted all this time looking back instead of supposedly enjoying the life he has now. If he were truly happy, he would not be wasting his time with these idiotic court cases.
I know, who would have imagined such vulgarity would ensue after he married this piece of work. He was warned, but he is so headstrong and impetuous that he just carried on regardless. On the other hand, if Megan controls all aspects of Harry's interviews, why was her own career such a colossal failure? Some say she was never more than a glorified extra, even in "Suits." She had an Emmy Award-winning dad and a Hollywood producer husband, still she couldn't make it. I say lack of talent and a refusal to collaborate with others on set. Life passes very quickly, and Harry should be enjoying precious times with his children, not dwelling on past wrongs or perceived wrongs. If he is truly happy, then what has gone before should now be just a fading memory.
Well, if Harry received no payment for the ITV program, there would surely have been the usual note at the bottom of the screen saying that he wasn't paid anything. If, however, Harry had paid and donated his fee to Invictus, I'm sure that the whole world would have been told with bells on.
Post a Comment