.jpg)
Meghan Markle’s monogram has recently ignited a debate due to the inclusion of a crown, with royal enthusiasts expressing mixed reactions. The discussion began when a U.S. influencer named Amanda shared a handwritten note from Meghan on social media. What caught people's attention was not just the letter itself but the presence of a crown symbol within Meghan’s monogram at the top of the note. This has led to renewed scrutiny over Meghan’s use of royal imagery despite her and Prince Harry stepping down from their roles as senior members of the royal family in 2020.
Amanda had previously been vocal about her skepticism regarding Meghan’s portrayal in the Netflix documentary series Harry & Meghan. After Amanda’s remarks gained traction online, Meghan reached out with a personal note, attempting to offer reassurance. In her message, Meghan addressed Amanda’s concerns directly, writing, “Dear Amanda, I heard you were feeling scared. Don’t be. This is the fun part. Let’s enjoy it.” She signed off with, “As ever, Meghan.”
However, rather than Meghan’s words, it was her monogram that captured widespread attention. Many royal watchers took to the comments section, questioning the appropriateness of Meghan’s continued use of a symbol so closely associated with the British monarchy. One individual expressed skepticism, commenting, “Why does her monogram have a crown? She left the royal family but still wants the perks.” Another remarked, “A crown, Meghan? Really? You’re in California now.”
Ads
This controversy over Meghan’s royal connections is just one of many instances where she has found herself at the center of public debate. In recent weeks, allegations of past misconduct have resurfaced, adding to the ongoing scrutiny of her character. Specifically, Jason Knauf, a former Kensington Palace staffer, has reiterated his claims that Meghan mistreated staff members in 2018. Knauf, who previously filed an official complaint about Meghan’s alleged behavior, spoke about the matter in an interview with 60 Minutes Australia, affirming that he had no regrets about coming forward. While Meghan has consistently denied these accusations, Buckingham Palace launched an internal review, though the findings were never publicly released.
Despite facing persistent criticism, Meghan has continued to maintain strong friendships with those closest to her. One example of this was seen in the recent release of author Lindsay Jill Roth’s book Romances and Practicalities. In the dedication section, Roth paid tribute to Meghan, referring to her as a “sister by choice.” The two women formed a close bond during their time at Northwestern University and have remained friends ever since. Meghan even served as Roth’s maid of honor at her wedding in 2016, further highlighting their enduring friendship.
Ads
As Meghan and Prince Harry continue building their new lives in California, the public remains fascinated by the couple’s ongoing relationship with royal traditions. Meghan’s monogram, which still incorporates a crown, has only added to the speculation about whether she has truly distanced herself from the royal family or if she still holds on to certain aspects of her former status. While some see the monogram as a harmless design choice, others believe it contradicts her decision to step away from royal duties.
Ultimately, the conversation surrounding Meghan’s monogram is reflective of a larger discussion about her place within the royal narrative. Ever since she and Prince Harry made the controversial decision to step back from their royal responsibilities, public opinion has remained divided. Some believe the couple has every right to forge their own path while maintaining certain connections to their past. Others, however, argue that they should fully embrace their new lives without relying on royal symbolism.
Ads
Meghan’s use of the monogram with a crown raises important questions about identity and legacy. While she no longer holds an official royal role, the inclusion of the crown suggests a continued link to her past. For many royal fans, this fuels the perception that Meghan wants to retain elements of her former life while also enjoying the freedoms that come with stepping away from the royal institution. Critics argue that this is an attempt to benefit from the prestige of the monarchy without the obligations that come with it.
Meanwhile, Meghan’s supporters see no issue with her use of the monogram, arguing that it is simply a reflection of her past and does not necessarily indicate an unwillingness to move forward. They point out that royal symbols often remain part of one’s identity even after official titles and duties change. Furthermore, Meghan and Harry have continued to use their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles, which were not revoked despite their decision to step down.
Ads
As discussions about Meghan’s royal associations continue, it is evident that she remains a highly polarizing figure. Her every move is scrutinized, from her personal relationships to her fashion choices and even her stationery. The monogram debate is just another chapter in the ongoing conversation about Meghan’s identity and her place within the royal sphere. While some may view the controversy as overblown, it highlights the broader fascination—and sometimes criticism—that surrounds Meghan and her choices.
As she and Prince Harry move forward with their lives in California, questions about their connection to the royal family will likely persist. Whether Meghan’s use of royal imagery is a deliberate decision or simply a design preference, it is clear that her actions continue to spark discussions about her role in the larger royal narrative. Only time will tell if she gradually distances herself from these symbols or if she continues to embrace certain elements of her past while carving out a new future for he
rself and her family.
Post a Comment