Ads
Reports suggest Meghan Markle has been left reeling after being quietly sidelined by Jeff Bezos, amid renewed controversy linked to Kim Kardashian. But this is only the surface of a much larger and far more explosive situation—one that has been quietly building for years.
For half a decade, one woman has remained almost entirely silent while holding secrets that could radically alter public understanding of Meghan’s rise and fall. Jessica Mulroney, once a central figure in Meghan Markle’s inner circle, has long been regarded as the unseen architect behind Meghan’s transformation from cable-TV actress into a global celebrity and royal bride. That silence, however, appears to be nearing its breaking point.
Across New York’s major publishing houses, whispers have turned into frantic negotiations. Executives are reportedly circling a potential manuscript that insiders describe not as a celebrity memoir, but as a historical document—one capable of reframing the entire Sussex saga. This is not merely about money, though the rumored figures climb well into seven digits. It is about reckoning, exile, and the possibility that the woman who once guarded Meghan’s flame may now extinguish it.
Ads
Those close to the situation say this would not be a conventional tell-all. Unlike Prince Harry’s memoir, which was clearly positioned as a calculated strike in an ongoing public battle, Mulroney’s account would come from a civilian—someone granted unparalleled access to private moments, then abruptly erased. For years, she endured speculation, quiet distancing, and a public narrative that reduced her to collateral damage. Yet she said nothing. That restraint has only increased the value of her story.
To understand why her voice matters, one must revisit the depth of her bond with Meghan. The two met in Toronto while navigating entertainment and fashion circles. Mulroney, a stylist with elite connections and married into Canadian political royalty, became Meghan’s gateway to influence, refinement, and discretion. She advised on image, wardrobe, and the delicate choreography required to sustain a secret relationship with a British prince.
Their closeness was unmistakable at the 2018 royal wedding. Mulroney’s twin sons carried Meghan’s veil, while her daughter stood alongside Princess Charlotte as a bridesmaid. This was not casual friendship—it was public confirmation of trust and loyalty.
Ads
Then came the rupture. In 2020, amid the height of the Black Lives Matter movement, Mulroney became embroiled in a highly publicized dispute with a Toronto influencer, who accused her of weaponizing privilege. The fallout was swift and devastating. Business partnerships vanished, her television roles ended, and her career was effectively dismantled despite a public apology.
During that crisis, the friend she had ushered into the monarchy vanished. Public support ceased. Social media affection disappeared. What remained was a symbolic gesture—flowers—but no visible defense. Observers concluded the friendship had become a liability.
Royal commentator Rob Shuter summarized the dynamic bluntly: Meghan values loyalty directed toward her, but does not always return it. Many believe Mulroney assumed she was the exception. She wasn’t.
Now divorced after a long marriage and rebuilding her career, Mulroney reportedly stands at a crossroads. Writing the book would mean accepting the friendship is truly over. But as one publishing insider noted, restraint no longer pays. Only raw truth does.
Ads
While this storm gathers, another crisis has already detonated in Hollywood. Meghan and Harry’s attempt to integrate into elite celebrity culture appears to have backfired spectacularly at a high-profile party hosted at Jeff Bezos’s mansion for Kris Jenner. Though initially welcomed, their presence reportedly raised eyebrows.
The real damage came afterward. Photos were posted, then abruptly demanded to be removed. The Sussex camp allegedly blamed others, citing permissions and supposed agreements that insiders insist never existed. The Kardashians, masters of public relations, were unimpressed. Kim and Khloé later clarified publicly that permission had been granted—and revoked only after the Sussexes realized the event coincided with Remembrance Day in the UK.
Kim even offered what many saw as subtle criticism, suggesting the situation could have been handled with humor rather than panic. The implication was clear: Meghan and Harry misread the room.
That misstep may have cost Meghan something far greater than social embarrassment. Jeff Bezos, now a major power broker behind the Met Gala, is not known for tolerating disruption. Insiders say this single incident may have permanently closed the door on Meghan’s long-rumored Met Gala ambitions.
Ads
This reflects a broader trend. Spotify has already cut ties. Netflix is reportedly cautious. Hollywood insiders increasingly describe the Sussexes as difficult, unpredictable, and prone to drama. Invitations are drying up—not out of cruelty, but self-preservation.
Critics argue this follows a consistent pattern. Meghan’s history is marked by severed relationships—family members, friends, professional allies—once they become inconvenient. Loyalty is demanded, but rarely reciprocated.
This is why the possibility of a Mulroney memoir is so unsettling. She is not just a former friend. She is a living record of Meghan before palace protocols, before media strategy, before the carefully curated narrative. If she speaks, she does not simply criticize—she contextualizes.
Post a Comment