Ads
Good day readers, it's time for our regular analysis of the ongoing drama unfolding in the royal family. Prince Harry's planned attendance at King Charles' upcoming coronation on May 6th has sparked heated debate, with some arguing he should not be welcomed after the damage caused by his memoir.
As you likely know by now, Harry confirmed he will be there to support his father at Westminster Abbey for the sacred ceremony. However, his wife Meghan Markle will remain in their California home with their children Archie and Lili. This has raised questions about whether Harry is simply putting on an act to appear united with the royals, after spending the last few years trying to distance himself while leveling bombshell accusations in interviews and his biography "Spare".
Ads
GB News host Dan Wooten has been one of Harry's harshest critics, and he did not hold back during a segment on the issue last night. When guest Joanna Juroz questioned why the focus was on Meghan and not Harry, given it is he who will be attending, Wooton fired back insistently. "I mean come on, this guy has sold out his own family. He reported private conversations with his dad moments after his father's funeral," Wooton argued passionately.
Ads
He went on to say that Harry trying to "play happy families" at the coronation after destroying the monarchy's reputation is unacceptable. Wooton believes King Charles should not have extended an invite in the first place. The host makes a fair point - Harry's claims in his memoir painted both Camilla and Charles in an unflattering light. A source close to Charles was quoted saying the future king felt "distraught", "angry" and "outraged" over the embarrassing details shared.
Ads
Adding another layer to the drama, royal author Andrew Lownie told Express that Harry has become a "lost cause" and it's best to simply "cut him loose". Lownie argued their behavior has damaged how the public perceives them in the UK. And while spare may have given insight into Harry's perspective, it likely worsened attitudes towards the Sussexes. So some experts argue there is little upside to welcoming Harry back for such an important royal function.
Ads
However, others point out that despite past missteps, family should come before petty disputes. As the monarch, Charles must rise above past hurts and set an example of forgiveness and reconciliation. Perhaps the coronation could serve as an opportunity for a fresh start between Harry and the rest of the Windsors. But it remains unclear if the rift runs too deep after everything that's transpired publicly over the last couple years.
Ads
Only time will tell how the dynamic plays out when Harry makes his return to the UK for the first major royal event since stepping down as a senior working royal. Buckingham Palace stated they were "pleased" he accepted the invitation, so for now the plan is for him to attend in a show of support. But lurking beneath is lingering resentment about how Harry's confessions damaged the House of Windsor's image and privacy. The coronation may just end up bringing those tensions back to the forefront.
Ads
It's a saga that continues grabbing headlines as analysts and commentators offer opposing views. Where do you stand on whether Prince Harry should be welcomed at King Charles' upcoming coronation? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below. There are reasonable arguments on both sides of this debate. In the end, only the royal family themselves know the full extent of hurt caused and whether true reconciliation is realistic. We'll keep monitoring for further developments in the ongoing drama between Harry, Meghan and the rest of the Royal Family. Thanks for reading!
Post a Comment